This method ends up giving you the hand with the best land/mana spell ratio, which results in many more 2-4 land draws on your initial 7 cards. There is also the fact that single game matches have a best of 2-possible hands mode. Many mediocre players may rise to higher than usual ranks as they defeat total beginners. Remember that would be high ranking players are still relatively low in the ranking system. The constant introduction of new ranking systems must be accounted for when evaluating a deck, a type of play mode and MTG Arena as a whole. This leads to a much smaller meta for us current players. We must keep in mind that, we are at a relatively lower amount of players compared to what this game will net in the coming months/years. There are even more compounding factors given the new/beta state of the game. Control decks stand a MUCH better chance in best of 3 games match mode.
Single game matches favor the aggro/midrange style decks. I believe there is a fundamental difference between these two modes that many people here have noticed. You may hear "Nexus of fate/Fog" decks are out of control, but they are mostly represented in "traditional" matches. The common complaint is "mono-red aggro/burn dominates." However, this only applies to single-game matches. Wizards just released ranked "traditional" (best of 3 matches) constructed, so this topic becomes even more relevant. We keep bringing it up, but have no thread for it. This is a topic discussed/hinted at on various threads on this forum. Meta difference between Single match and "Traditional" constructed games
0 kommentar(er)
